Tucson Bankruptcy Blog
Creditors Do Not Have PMSI in Car Loan Portion Related to Negative Equity
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that a creditor does not have a purchase money security interest (PMSI) in the portion of the debtor’s car loan related to negative equity of a vehicle traded in at the time of a new vehicle purchase; thus, the negative equity portion of the claim may be bifurcated as unsecured.
PMSI refers to a claim on property that affords a lender, who provides financing for goods or equipment, priority ranking over other secured creditors. (11 U.S.C. § 547). Negative equity exists where the value of the asset used to secure a loan is less than the balance on the loan. Negative equity can occur, for example, when a vehicle with an outstanding loan balance is traded in for a new one and that previous balance is added to the new loan. Bifurcation occurs when a creditor’s claim is split into secured and unsecured claims. (11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) prevents bifurcation of certain claims).
The decision created a split from eight other circuits. Under the U.C.C., negative equity is antecedent debt and a lender can only obtain PMSI for new value. Additionally, the Bankruptcy Code only gives preferential treatment to security interests “to the extent that the obligation relates to the receipt of truly new value,” not repackaged old obligations.
KEYWORDS: Purchase Money Security Interest (PMSI), Negative Equity, Antecedent Debt, Claim Bifurcation, Unsecured Claims, Secured Claims, Security Interest, 11 U.S.C. Section 1325, 11 U.S.C. Section 547, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Penrod
Attorney Matthew Foley has been featured on every Tucson news media
Read Related Posts:
Student Loan Disbursements Exempt from Bankruptcy Pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1095(d), student loans, grants, and work awards cannot be taken, via garnishment, attachment, or otherwise, by creditors to satisfy any debts owed by the student. While some states have opted...
BAP Uses Hatton II Version of Beard Test to Determine Dischargeability of Untimely Filed Tax Returns
The BAP for the Ninth Circuit held that the proper determination of the dischargeability of tax debt related to untimely filed tax returns is not limited to a narrow, exclusively objective analysis of the form and content of the tax returns; rather, it must be broad...
Arizona statute of limitations on credit card debt is six years. Merely missing a payment does not start the clock on the statute of limitations. Unless there are contrary terms in the credit card account agreement, the lender must accelerate the debt or demand full payment for the clock on the statute of limitations to start running.